Good faith collaboration : (Record no. 73135)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 04064nam a2200577 i 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 6267481
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20220712204718.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 151223s2012 mau ob 001 eng d
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
-- print
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
ISBN 9780262289719
-- electronic
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
-- electronic
082 04 - CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Call Number 030
100 1# - AUTHOR NAME
Author Reagle, Joseph Michael,
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Good faith collaboration :
Sub Title the culture of Wikipedia /
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Number of Pages 1 PDF (xv, 244 pages).
490 1# - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement History and foundations of information science
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is built by a community - a community of Wikipedians who are expected to "assume good faith" when interacting with one another. In Good Faith Collaboration, Joseph Reagle examines this unique collaborative culture.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Wikipedia, says Reagle, is not the first effort to create a freely shared, universal encyclopedia; its early twentieth-century ancestors include Paul Otlet's Universal Repository and H.G. Wells's proposal for a World Brain. Both these projects, like Wikipedia, were fuelled by new technology-which at the time included index cards and microfilm. What distinguishes Wikipedia from these and other more recent ventures is Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture, as seen not only in the writing and editing of articles but also in their discussion pages and edit histories. Keeping an open perspective on both knowledge claims and other contributors, Reagle argues, creates an extraordinary collaborative potential.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Wikipedia is famously an encyclopedia "anyone can edit," and Reagle examines Wikipedia's openness and several challenges to it: technical features that limit vandalism to articles; private actions to mitigate potential legal problems; and Wikipedia's own internal bureaucratization. He explores Wikipedia's process of consensus (reviewing a dispute over naming articles on television shows) and examines the way leadership and authority work in an open content community.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been imitated, analyzed, and satirized. Despite the social unease over its implications for individual autonomy, institutional authority, and the character (and quality) of cultural products, Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the century-old pursuit of a universal encyclopedia."--Jacket.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--SUBJECT 1
General subdivision Technological innovations
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--SUBJECT 1
General subdivision Collaboration
856 42 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6267481
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type eBooks
264 #1 -
-- Cambridge, Massachusetts :
-- MIT Press,
-- c2010.
264 #2 -
-- [Piscataqay, New Jersey] :
-- IEEE Xplore,
-- [2012]
336 ## -
-- text
-- rdacontent
337 ## -
-- electronic
-- isbdmedia
338 ## -
-- online resource
-- rdacarrier
588 ## -
-- Description based on PDF viewed 12/23/2015.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--SUBJECT 1
-- Electronic encyclopedias
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--SUBJECT 1
-- Wikis (Computer science)
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--SUBJECT 1
-- Communication in learning and scholarship
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--SUBJECT 1
-- Authorship
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--SUBJECT 1
-- Online social networks

No items available.