000 03582nam a22004815i 4500
001 978-3-031-02319-4
003 DE-He213
005 20240730163900.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 220601s2019 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031023194
_9978-3-031-02319-4
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-02319-4
_2doi
050 4 _aTK5105.5-5105.9
072 7 _aUKN
_2bicssc
072 7 _aCOM043000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aUKN
_2thema
082 0 4 _a004.6
_223
100 1 _aLiu, Jiqun.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_981018
245 1 0 _aInteractive IR User Study Design, Evaluation, and Reporting
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby Jiqun Liu, Chirag Shah.
250 _a1st ed. 2019.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2019.
300 _aXVII, 75 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aSynthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services,
_x1947-9468
505 0 _aPreface -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Interactive Information Retrieval -- Methodology: Paper Selection and Coding Scheme -- Faceted Framework of IIR User Studies -- Evaluating IIR User Studies of Different Types -- Implications and Limitations of the Faceted Framework -- Conclusion and Future Directions -- Appendix -- Bibliography -- Authors' Biographies.
520 _aSince user study design has been widely applied in search interactions and information retrieval (IR) systems evaluation studies, a deep reflection and meta-evaluation of interactive IR (IIR) user studies is critical for sharpening the instruments of IIR research and improving the reliability and validity of the conclusions drawn from IIR user studies. To this end, we developed a faceted framework for supporting user study design, reporting, and evaluation based on a systematic review of the state-of-the-art IIR research papers recently published in several top IR venues (n=462). Within the framework, we identify three major types of research focuses, extract and summarize facet values from specific cases, and highlight the under-reported user study components which may significantly affect the results of research. Then, we employ the faceted framework in evaluating a series of IIR user studies against their respective research questions and explain the roles and impacts of the underlying connections and "collaborations" among different facet values. Through bridging diverse combinations of facet values with the study design decisions made for addressing research problems, the faceted framework can shed light on IIR user study design, reporting, and evaluation practices and help students and young researchers design and assess their own studies.
650 0 _aComputer networks .
_931572
650 1 4 _aComputer Communication Networks.
_981019
700 1 _aShah, Chirag.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_981020
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
_981021
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031002267
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031011917
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031034473
830 0 _aSynthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services,
_x1947-9468
_981022
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02319-4
912 _aZDB-2-SXSC
942 _cEBK
999 _c85088
_d85088